University of Utah impact scholar Tim Shriver poses for a portrait in the Beverly Taylor Sorenson Arts and Education Complex at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City on Wednesday, April 19, 2023. Kristin Murphy, Deseret News
How did we get here?
As the pace of change stirs fear and anxiety itself, social media fans the flame of those feelings.
“I think our politicians have come to the conclusion that hatred, contempt and negativity are more effective at raising money and mobilizing bases and constituencies. They’ve entered into sort of an unholy alliance with the media because a lot of media finds the same thing. The more hateful the story, the more clicks it gets,” he said.
At the same time, many institutions that moderate those forces, help cross divides and collaborate, are themselves in a weakened condition, such as religious institutions or civic and service organizations like the Rotary or the Lions Club.
“Things like that would have held people together and now there’s less trust in them,” he said.
Fewer people are volunteering for the armed forces, institutions that have traditionally engendered a love of country “or a commitment to the higher ideals of the country even if it wasn’t meeting it,” Shriver said.
What can break the cycle?
The “perfect storm” of forces has contributed to the nation’s “cycle of addiction to contempt,” he said.
Restoring dignity to public discourse and to basic human interactions requires self-reflection and committing to personal change regarding our perceptions of those we consider “other,” he said.
Asked what he means by dignity, Shriver explained, “I see myself in you. I see we have something in common at a deep level. You have something inherent in you that is good and beautiful and capable of contributing to the hopes and dreams and future of the country.”
There are other steps people can take to lower the temperature and insist on more thoughtful public discourse. Shriver said he quit watching cable television news. People can withhold campaign contributions to candidates whose rhetoric threatens the fabric of the nation, he said.
“We’d like to have a debate in the state of Utah, maybe a presidential debate, but make it about dignity, not about your policy position on foreign policy or policy position on the economy or immigration or social issues, whatever they are. Let’s have a debate on how you treat your opponents,” he said.
But before something like that happens, there is hard work to be done on the University of Utah campus and in the larger community, Shriver said.
“It’s an enterprise grounded in the scholarship of psychologists, sociologists, anthropologists, educators, political science people. It’s a project grounded in activism, people who believe that by marshaling the best science and best ideas and putting them into the hands of activists who have a willingness to put one foot in front of the other and walk the pavement and knock on doors and use social media, that we can put those two things together and create scholarly impact,” he said.